Legal Opinion

Bonwit Teller, Inc. v. Morris

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Concededly plaintiff was not entitled to the attachment on the theory upon which it was applied for and obtained. It contends, however, that the motion to vacate should have been denied because it appeared that defendant was not a resident of New York State. Although the word “ resident ” as used in subdivision 1 of section 903 of the Civil Practice Act has been held repeatedly to refer merely to temporary sojourn as distinguished from domicile, the same word as used in subdivision 7 of the same section obviously refers to domicile and not to temporary sojourn. Unless subdivision 7 refers to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bodine v. BodineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  2. Gotham National Bank v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Auction Co. v. BeltNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API