Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Roberts

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 17, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Law. Action by A. F. Kendrick against Columbus Roberts. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appealed and executed a supersedeas bond, which was approved.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

In this case there was a verdict for the plaintiff for $5,500. There was a motion for a new trial heard and overruled. Writ of error was obtained within the six months allowed by statute from the time the motion for new trial was overruled, and the case finally ended in this court. At the same time a supersedeas bond wás presented in the sum of $7,000, which counsel for defendant stated to the court was satisfactory to plaintiff’s attorney, and that he was authorized to so state to the court. Counsel for the plaintiff now states that this is correct, and counsel for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BUTCHERS'BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Keyser v. FarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Ensminger v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Clarke v. Eureka County BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Terminal Ry. Co. v. WarinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. Parker v. New England Oil Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
  3. In re GustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  4. Brick v. A. I. Namm & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API