Legal Opinion

Hertogs v. Red-E-Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1927No. 26,306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Plaintiff on March 15, 1926, leased to defendant for a term of five years a filling station “as it stands.” When so let there was office furniture in the building and some “lubricating units.” These were removed by a prior occupant before April 1, 1926, the time defendant’s term began. There was some protest, but defendant took possession and made improvements, changes, and repairs to the value of $200. Defendant learned, after the lease was made and the first month’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buck v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Bowder v. GillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larsen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API