Legal Opinion

Rukeyser v. Rouss

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

Action on stipulated facts to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. It appears that Fountain & Choate, a corporation, was the general contractor under a contract dated the 28th day of March, 1916, for certain construction work on the premises Nos. 104-110 *419Greene street, in the borough of Manhattan. On April 6, 1916, the general contractor made a subcontract with the defendant Tostevin, by which, for the sum of $27,000, the latter was to do certain cement and concrete work on the building, and said contract provided among other things, as follows: “Article IX: That the sum to be paid to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gass v. SoutherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Linneman v. BieberNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Donovan v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Gaas v. . SoutherNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rukeyser v. Fountain & Choate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API