Legal Opinion

State v. Barrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1956No. 73PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam.

The violation of the, ordinance of the City of Green-ville is a violation of a penal law of the State of North Carolina, because G.S. 14-4 provides that “if any person shall violate an ordinance of a city or town, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” Board of Education v. Henderson, 126 N.C. 689, 36 S.E. 158; S. v. Taylor, 133 N.C. 755, 46 S.E. 5; S.v. Wilkes, 233 N.C. 645, 65 S.E. 2d 129.

The validity of Judge Bundy’s judgment suspending execution of the sentence of imprisonment on certain conditions is not challenged on appeal. S. v. Johnson, 226 N.C. 266, 37 S.E. 2d 678; S. v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. State v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Board of Education v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. State v. Taylor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Eastern Carolina Tastee-Freez, Inc. v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API