Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided January 9, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Quillian S. Yancey State Attorney Tenth Judicial Circuit

QUESTION:

When a witness lives in another state and `more than 50 miles from the location of the trial' and is requested to come to Florida and testify at a criminal trial and, in compliance with such request, appears and testifies at the trial, should such witness be compensated according to s. 92.142, F.S., or according to s.942.03, F.S.?

SUMMARY:

In the absence of any other statutory directives or procedures (or a valid court order in a particular case), neither s. 942.03 nor s. 92.142, F.S., applies to an out-of-state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. Palm Beach Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Vilsack v. General Commercial Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Palm Beach County v. RoseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API