Legal Opinion

Carroll v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1928No. C-925Published

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The Treasury Department having called for bids for furnishing designated electrical equipment to be used in connection with other electrical machinery at the sanatorium, Fort Stanton, New Mexico, the plaintiffs made a proposal to supply same for $1,400. Their bid was accepted upon *409conditions stated in the letter of acceptance. They shipped the machinery and after its arrival at destination it was found upon inspection to have defects which, except in one particular, need not be detailed. This exception is that the flywheel, or some of its spokes, was broken. The plaintiffs sought to supply…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Philadelphia Whiting Co. v. Detroit White Lead WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rio Cape Line, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API