Legal Opinion

Austin v. Auto Handling Corporation

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 12, 2023No. 1:18-cv-00082Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION JARREN AUSTIN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 1:18-CV-82-HAB ) AUTO HANDLING CORPORATION, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) AMENDED1 OPINION AND ORDER Jarren Austin (“Austin”) claims that Defendants2 discriminated against him because of his race by delaying his full-time hire, forcing him to work more labor-intensive jobs, subjecting him to a hostile work environment, and terminating him without cause. Defendants dispute Austin’s claims and have moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 185). That motion is now…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API