Legal Opinion

Hay v. Leonard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1948No. 16047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Order of Judge Eatmon follows:

The above entitled action was instituted to challenge the validity and restrain the enforcement of an Act of the General Assembly of South Carolina passed at the 1947 Session, 45 St. at Large, p. 589. The defendants in the cause are the County Treasurer of Charleston County, to whom the tax is payable…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Roddey v. BYRNES, GOVERNORSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Bradley v. Cherokee School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. SHIPMAN v. DuPRESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Beard v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API