Legal Opinion
United States v. Salgado
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 3, 1988No. C-4951PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT J. McNICHOLS, Chief Judge.
On March 4, 1988 Mr. Salgado brought a motion under Rule 60(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to set aside a conviction obtained against him in this district in 1964. A conference was held on March 22, 1988 at 8:30 a.m. AUSA Crum and Mr. Kitching appeared personally, and Mr. Mullery and Mr. Salgado participated telephonically. It was the general consensus of all concerned that the equities militate strongly in favor of relieving defendant from prospective operation of the judgment. The question is whether, equities aside, the Court has authority to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ernest Francis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Melesio Manuel Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. KarahaliasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Wilfredo Felix AyalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- United States v. Jorge L. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ewart Mark HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- John DOE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.