Legal Opinion

United States v. Jason Eric Swanson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2003No. 01-1934PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Jason Eric Swanson appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After a jury trial, Swanson was sentenced to 90 months of imprisonment. Swanson argues that the district court erred in failing to suppress two pieces of evidence: (1) the firearm that was the basis of his conviction, because it was the fruit of the unlawful seizure of his automobile; and (2) statements attributed to him, because they were elicited in violation of the Miranda rule. Swanson argues that the introduction of the firearm and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. RLR Investments, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. Robinson v. CookDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  4. Baltimore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API