Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Borenstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 5, 1911Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Samuel Ginsberg against David Borenstein and another. Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to open their default, and one denying a motion for a reargument of the former motion.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

Defendants appeal from two orders of the Municipal Court; -one denying their motion to open their default with $10 costs, and one denying a motion for a reargument of the former motion. An examination of the papers discloses no reason why this court should disturb the discretion exercised by the court below in denying the motions. "An appellate court only interferes with the rulings of a trial court made within its discretion when an injustice may have been done.” Richard v. National Distilling Co. (Sup.) 95 N. Y. Supp. 547. Costs, however, should not have been imposed upon the denial of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. LefkowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  2. Richard v. Nattional Distilling Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API