Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Clark

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Reserved Question from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C. J.

Tbe defendant was indicted for embezzling $285, bail money forfeited in the district court of Honolulu, the property of the *392City and County of Honolulu, with, which, he being an employee of the City and County, to-wit, second clerk of the district magistrate, and charged by appointment of the magistrate with the duty of collecting and receiving the aforesaid bail money, was entrusted by consent and authority of the City and Cqunty.

The defendant demurred to-the indictment on the grounds, in substance, as .follows: (1) that it does not show that the money…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. O'BrienTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Moore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Territory v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Territory v. KealohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API