Legal Opinion

Erzrumly v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 24, 1977No. 62990PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff brought this action in strict liability, alleging that two bottles manufactured by Coca-Cola and sold by Dominick’s exploded injuring her. After presentation of her case she moved to amend her complaint to include a count based on the theory of res ipsa loquitur. The court denied her motion and granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. On appeal she contends these rulings were erroneous.

At trial the following pertinent evidence was adduced.

Anwar Erzrumly

He is plaintiff’s father. At about 1 p.m. on Saturday, June 7, 1969, he took his five children, wife, and father to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tweedy v. Wright Ford Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Lowrey v. MalkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Millette v. RadostaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Conductron Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bejda v. SGL Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Doyle v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Alvarez v. American Isuzu MotorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API