Erzrumly v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff brought this action in strict liability, alleging that two bottles manufactured by Coca-Cola and sold by Dominick’s exploded injuring her. After presentation of her case she moved to amend her complaint to include a count based on the theory of res ipsa loquitur. The court denied her motion and granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. On appeal she contends these rulings were erroneous.
At trial the following pertinent evidence was adduced.
Anwar Erzrumly
He is plaintiff’s father. At about 1 p.m. on Saturday, June 7, 1969, he took his five children, wife, and father to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Tweedy v. Wright Ford Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Michelin Tire Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Lowrey v. MalkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Millette v. RadostaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Conductron Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Bejda v. SGL Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Doyle v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Alvarez v. American Isuzu MotorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.