Legal Opinion
Munoz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 9, 1992No. 91-871PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The sole point on appeal from the appellant’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Denny v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Palmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tapia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995