Legal Opinion

Barbour Flax Spinning Co. v. Hagerty

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiiomñ to Hudson Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

*408The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The trial judge found that the petitioner sustained a compound fracture of the right arm at the elbow, and that owing to a bony growth- caused by the fracture, he is permanently unable to bend his arm at the elbow as formerly, and will be unable to bend it more than ninety degrees; he thereupon awarded compensation at the rate of $5 per week for a period of two hundred weeks. ° There is no finding that the compensation bears such relation to -the amounts stated in the schedule of the act as the disabilities bear to those produced by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James A. Banister Co. v. KrigerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Verra v. Mayor and Council of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Wallace v. American Cyanamid Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API