Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Company v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1974No. 6356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARD, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The problem: Was Charlie Scott an employee of the insured, Sam Fitzhugh Water Well Service, at the time he received his injuries or was he an independent contractor? The trial Court entered judgment in accordance with the verdict of the jury that he was an employee and that he was totally and permanently disabled. The insurance carrier for Fitzhugh now insists by a variety of points that there was no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the employee finding and that the finding was so against the overwhelming weight and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Halliburton v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Anchor Casualty Company v. HartsfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Goodnight v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Swift v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guzman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Jorge L. Hernandez v. King Aerospace, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API