Navajo County v. Four Corners Pipe Line Company
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
McFARLAND, Justice (retired).
In support of the Petition for Rehearing, the briefs submitted by the Company and Amici Curiae express the belief that our original opinion in this matter is ambiguous as it relates to the statutory provision for a trial de novo in the superior court. 1 In conjunction with this doubt is the expressed feeling that we have judicially added the requirement that the superior court must initially find that the valuation method used by the State Department of Valuation was fundamentally unfair, arbitrary, fraudulent, or equitably excessive, as a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- State Tax Commission v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
- State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Tax Commission v. Eagle Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Morris v. WooleryArizona Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Graham County & the Arizona State Department v. Graham County Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.