Legal Opinion
6419 New Utrecht Realty Corp. v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
In this action for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and money damages, plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction barring further proceeding to condemn the site owned by the corporate plaintiff; and defendant cross-moves for summary judgment.
The New York City Transit Authority (Transit Authority) decided that it needed a new electrical substation on the BMT West End line to meet additional power requirements and requested the New York City Site Selection Board (Selection Board) to designate one of several submitted alternate sites. Corporate plaintiff owns the site selected by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Matter of Gilbert Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broadway Schenectady Entertainment, Inc. v. County of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001