Halpern v. Halpern

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 M. David Halpern (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s Order finding that the Consent Order terminating Husband’s duty to pay alimony to JoAnne Orent Hal-pern (“Wife”) was of no legal effect because it was not properly filed of record. In support of his appeal, Husband argues that the trial court erred in the manner in which it defined “entry” as used in 42 Pa.C.S. section 5505 and when it found that the Consent Order was of no legal effect. Husband also argues that the trial court erred when it failed to grant his preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer…