Legal Opinion
Reif v. U.S. Department of Labor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-3689Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HARVEY REIF, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-3689 (TSC) DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Harvey Reif was exposed to various sources of radiation during his work as a contractor employee at nuclear facilities operated by the Department of Energy (“DOE”). J.A. 665–66. Reif was subsequently diagnosed with 36 cancers, which he and his doctors claim were caused by his work at DOE. See, e.g., J.A. 638. He now challenges the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) decision denying him compensation under the Energy Employees…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- FCC v. Prometheus Radio ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Troy Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Kenneth P. Prill v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.