Legal Opinion · Dissent

Outlaw v. Barnes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 30, 1923No. 11208Published

1Dissent

*172Mr. Justice Fraser:

I dissent. This case has been before, this Court before, and will be found reported in 118 S. C., at page 189; 110 S. E., 124.

This was an action for partition. The defendants set up title in themselves. The verdict was for the plaintiff and reads : “We find for the plaintiffs one-fourth undivided interest in dispute.” Judge Rice, who heard the case, signed a consent order after the Court adj ourned. The defendants were dissatisfied with the decree, and Judge, Rice made a subsequent order, changing the decree, on the ground that he was merely making a clerical,change. From…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Outlaw v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API