Legal Opinion

State v. Richter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1987No. 86-884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Herbert L. Richter, was charged with third offense driving while intoxicated and with refusing to submit to a chemical blood, breath, or urine test in violation of ordinances of the city of Scottsbluff.

At the arraignment on February 4, 1986, the defendant pleaded not guilty, the public defender was appointed to represent him, and he was released on his own recognizance. The defendant moved to suppress all evidence derived from the stop of the defendant’s vehicle on February 4, 1986, on the grounds the stop was warrantless and without probable cause. This motion and his motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. KlingelhoeferNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. PeeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BishopNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WiltshireNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Herbert L. Richter v. Charles L. Fairbanks, Scotts Bluff County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. BabcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BeerbohmNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API