Legal Opinion

Dubey v. Stroh Brewery Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1990No. Docket 109786PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendant summary disposition pursuant to MCE 2.116(0(10), dismissing plaintiff’s age discrimination suit brought under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq. We affirm.

Plaintiff argues the trial court erred in utilizing the shifting burden analysis first set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green, 411 US 792; 93 S Ct 1817; 36 L Ed 2d 668 (1973), and later reiterated in Texas Dep’t of Community Affairs v Burdine, 450 US 248; 101 S Ct 1089; 67 L Ed 2d 207 (1981). The proper test, plaintiff argues, is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Meeka v. D & F CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Town v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kimberly Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API