Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1894No. 1356PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

— This was an action by the state against the defendant for forgery. The information was as follows:

1 ‘ Comes now Milo A. Boot, county attorney and prosecuting attorney for Thurston county, State of "Washington, and the court being in session and the grand jui’y not being in session, gives the court to understand and be informed that one Harry Wright is guilty of the crime of forgery, committed as follows, to wit: He, the said Harry Wright, at the city of Olympia, in Thurston county, State of Washington, on the 17th day of October, 1893,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. TildenIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API