Legal Opinion

State v. Deschambault

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 17, 1963No. 3810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*217Webber, J.

On exceptions. The respondent’s demurrer to an indictment intended to charge the statutory crime of cheating by false pretenses was overruled below. The respondent contends that the indictment is fatally defective.

We are concerned here only with so much of the indictment as purports to allege the false pretenses and the negation of the truth thereof. Those portions recite that the respondent “did falsely pretend to (the complainant) that he (the respondent), the duly elected and qualified Mayor of the City of Biddeford, Maine, for the year 1960, and ex officio, by virtue of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PerleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. State v. BeattieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  3. State v. PaulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. Mahofski v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Herrick v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  4. State v. DeschambaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API