Doty v. Whittlesey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Petition in chancery — showing that on the 3d day of April A. D. 1790, he purchased a home lot of A. Hamlin, which lot was mortgaged to David Whittlesey, for a debt said Hamlin owed Mm, whereby it became his duty to pay said Whittlesey; that in February A. D. 1790, said Whittlesey procured a decree in chancery, that unless the money due on the mortgage from said Hamlin to him, was paid by the 1st. of July A. D. 1790, the equity of redemption should be foreclosed; that he had…
Read the full summary
Petition in chancery — showing that on the 3d day of April A. D. 1790, he purchased a home lot of A. Hamlin, which lot was mortgaged to David Whittlesey, for a debt said Hamlin owed Mm, whereby it became his duty to pay said Whittlesey; that in February A. D. 1790, said Whittlesey procured a decree in chancery, that unless the money due on the mortgage from said Hamlin to him, was paid by the 1st. of July A. D. 1790, the equity of redemption should be foreclosed; that he had paid a part of said money before the 1st of July; that in going after the remainder of the money, he was taken sick,…
1Opinion of the Court
Upon hearing the petition, the court found the facts to be true and granted the petition, and pass a decree accordingly; and that said Whittlesey pay the cost.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Petterson v. WeinstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Console v. TorchinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Mixer v. SibleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Scully v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875