Legal Opinion
State v. Fine
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs (see, Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v Margareten, 64 NY2d 1008, 1010), the Attorney-General’s motion for a preliminary injunction denied, and the certified question answered in the negative.
This action by the Attorney-General seeking permanent injunctive relief under the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A) charges defendants with various acts of fraud in connection with the cooperative conversion of two Manhattan loft buildings during 1979. In September 1986, Supreme Court ordered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ottinger v. State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Horowitz Bros. & Margareten v. MargaretenNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. Barrios-PaoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. Credit Suisse Sec.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Council of New York v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- The People of the State of New York by Eric T. Schneiderman v. Maurice R. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kramer v. W10Z/515 Real Estate Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.