Legal Opinion

Russell v. Maria Kip Orphanage

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1907No. S.F. No. 4597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appellant instituted proceedings under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have determined his interest in the estate of Robert Russell, deceased. The facts are that Robert Russell executed his last will and testament on October 20, 1903, and seven days thereafter died. His will was duly admitted to probate. The fifth paragraph of the instrument provided:—

"Fifthly, I leave my farm, consisting of one hundred and ninety-seven acres within the city limits of Santa Cruz, to the Maria Kip Institute of San Francisco County and City, California, for them, to sell or dispose of as seems…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of UphamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. O'Connor v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Getz Bros. & Co. v. Federal Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of MoleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Estate of BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Estate of StaufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. In Re Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McGettigan v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API