Legal Opinion

Parker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 3, 1992No. 92-115PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

603 So.2d 616 (1992)

Anthony L. PARKER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 3, 1992.

Anthony L. Parker, pro se.

No appearance, for appellee.

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Anthony L. Parker, seeks review of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court's summary denial was based on a finding that the motion was untimely under the two-year limitation period set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm on other grounds.

At the outset, from our review of the record, we conclude that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Gust v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sheriff v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Max Magic Guzman-Aviles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Caragol v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API