Legal Opinion

Kossuth Trucking, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 7, 2006No. 2005-CA-02032-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTHWICK, J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. Kossuth Trucking, Inc. brought suit against Caterpillar, Inc. alleging that an engine in one of Kossuth’s trucks was negligently repaired by a mechanic for whom Caterpillar was responsible. Caterpillar was granted summary judgment based on the trial court’s conclusion that the mechanic was not Caterpillar’s agent. We agree and affirm the judgment.

FACTS

¶2. The object at the center of the parties’ dispute is the engine in a 1993 Freightliner truck. In May 2000, the previous owner (the grandfather of the owners of Kossuth) sent the truck to N & N Diesel Service…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kisner v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Richardson v. APAC-Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Levine v. Standard Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Miller v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portia Ishee v. Federal Natl Mortgage AssocCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API