Legal Opinion

Sandstrom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 30, 1976No. 47201, 47450PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

336 So.2d 572 (1976)

Ray SANDSTROM, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nos. 47201, 47450.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 30, 1976.

Rehearing Denied September 23, 1976.

Ray Sandstrom, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

2Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Robert Richards, Jr., a Minor by His Father and Next Friend Robert Richards v. Roger Thurston, as Principal of Marlboro High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. In Re WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Murrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Carnival Corp. v. BeverlyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Eubanks v. AgnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API