Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Schmid

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1283 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Claimant-appellant has been ruled ineligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits under Section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P. S. §802 (e), by the Bureau of Em*288ployment Security, the referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Section 402 (e) provides in part:

“An employee shall be ineligible for compensation for any week—
“(e) In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Harbutz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Morris Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tundel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. American Process Lettering, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CrillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Glenn v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Wertman v. UN. COMP. BD. of REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API