Legal Opinion
Montgomery & Associates, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. And Gilbert Kaap
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 24, 1987No. 85-1861PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BORK.
ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
BORK, Circuit Judge:
This case was disposed of on the merits by judgment and memorandum dated November 19, 1986, 804 F.2d 769 (D.C.Cir.), affirming the decision of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) in favor of respondents Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. and Gilbert Kapp (hereafter “Thomson McKinnon”). As a prevailing respondent and appellee, Thomson McKinnon on December 11, 1986 filed a motion for attorneys’ fees, which is opposed by petitioner Montgomery & Associates (“Montgomery”). Montgomery…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alabama Power Company v. Anne M. Gorsuch, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Robinson v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Seyler v. SeylerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Nos. 87-4849Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Hines v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.