Legal Opinion

People v. Black

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1986No. 84CA0441PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

Defendant, Earl S. Black, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree sexual assault, alleging that two jury members were coerced into agreeing to a guilty verdict. We affirm.

Following trial on the sexual assault charge, defendant filed affidavits from two jurors, including the foreperson, stating that they “would not have stated a verdict of guilty but for the coercion imposed ... by the other jurors.” At a hearing on defendant’s motion for new trial, one juror testified that she was “talked into” agreeing to a guilty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wharton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Santilli v. PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Kading v. KadingColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FerreroColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. RudnickColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. MollaunColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Hall v. LevineSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. HamptonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API