Legal Opinion
Burke v. Ford
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 11, 1967No. 632PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners, Oklahoma liquor retailers, brought this action under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U. S. C. § 1, to enjoin an alleged state-wide market division by all Oklahoma liquor wholesalers. The trial judge, sitting without a jury, found that there had in fact been a division of markets — both by territories and by brands. The court nevertheless entered judgment for the wholesalers because, among other reasons, it found that the interstate commerce prerequisite of the Sherman Act was not satisfied. The Court of Appeals affirmed upon the sole ground that “the proof was entirely…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Sealy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
3Cited by118 opinions
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.