Legal Opinion
Stuto v. Kerber
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard M. Platkin, J.
Defendants William J. McNeary III, William J. McNeary IV and Jamie Jayko move pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) seeking dismissal of the sole cause of action asserted against them: a claim brought pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 630, which imposes personal liability upon the 10 largest shareholders of a closely held corporation for unpaid wages due to employees. Plaintiff opposes the motion.
Wurld Media, Inc. (Wurld Media or the company) is a defunct Delaware corporation that maintained a place of business in the County of Saratoga. Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bartle v. Home Owners Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Sasso v. VachrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bristor v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Armstrong v. Dyer, HobbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- LaVigne v. FeinbloomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flannigan v. Vulcan Power Group, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Stuto v. KerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010