Legal Opinion

Bender v. McDowell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1894No. 11,471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Montgomery, J. PPEAL from the Seventh District Court, Parish of Madison. Whore, in an action under R. 0. 0. 3517 to revive a judgment, the defence is that the attorney who represented the defendant and waived service of the petition, upon which judgment by default was confirmed, was unauthorized, such allegations must be supported by the oath of the defendant, as a condition precedent to setting up such want of authority in the attorney.

Read the full summary

Montgomery, J. PPEAL from the Seventh District Court, Parish of Madison. Whore, in an action under R. 0. 0. 3517 to revive a judgment, the defence is that the attorney who represented the defendant and waived service of the petition, upon which judgment by default was confirmed, was unauthorized, such allegations must be supported by the oath of the defendant, as a condition precedent to setting up such want of authority in the attorney. “ No contrary doctrine has ever been held.” Doekham vs. Potter, 27 An. 71; citing and affirming, 9 M. 88; 10 M. 639; 8 N. S. 232-5; 114.23; 12R.95-7;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

This is an action to revive the judgment rendered in the case of W. K. Bender vs. J. B. McDowell, on the 11th of June, 1883, of which the subrogee subsequently became owner; to which the defence tendered in the answer is, that no valid judgment had originally been rendered against him, as he had never been cited. The answer specially denies that he ever employed or authorized any attorney to represent him in said proceeding, either to make an appearance, to accept service, or in any manner whatever.

In the record appears a written acceptance…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adkins' Heirs v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Hildebrand v. United ArtisansOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Gaudet v. LawesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Plaquemines Parish School Board v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. C. S. Burt & Co. v. LaplaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API