Legal Opinion

Matherne v. Brown

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2001No. 00-CA-1857PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

13CANNELLA, Judge.

Defendant, Brown & Root, appeals a workers’ compensation judgment finding Plaintiff, Kaylem Matherne, entitled to medical benefits and supplemental earnings benefits (SEBs) due to a toxic chemical exposure, and awarding Plaintiff penalties and attorney’s fees for Defendant’s arbitrary and capricious failure to provide benefits. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.

For several months prior to March 16, 1999, Plaintiff had been employed by Defendant and assigned to the Shell Oil Company (Shell) chemical plant in Norco, Louisiana. During the three to four weeks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Quinones v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Starkman v. Munholland United Methodist ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store WarehouseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown & Root v. MatherneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API