State ex rel. Wasserman v. O'Brien
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.(1) Relator had no right to offer oral proof on the trial of the issues presented by this action. “The relator who selects certiorari as his method of review and remedy subjects himself to having his rights decided upon such statement of facts as the return may make, if so responsive.” State ex rel. Gray v. Oconomomoc, 104 Wis. 622, 627, 80 N. W. 942. The return “imports absolute and complete verity, so far as it is responsive to the writ; and neither the allegations of the petition nor of the writ can serve to supply other facts merely because they are not traversed or otherwise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Gray v. Common Council of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Heller v. FuldnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Higgins v. License Commissioners of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Hippler v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Grant School District No. 4 v. School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- State ex rel. New Strand Theatre Co. v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.