Heaton v. Knight
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Madison District Gowri. AotioN to redeem from a sale for delinquent taxes after the execution of a treasurer’s deed, upon several grounds, one of which, was that the notice required by statute had not been served on the person in whose name the land was taxed. There was a decree for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
*6871. TAX SALE and deed: insufficient notice of application for deed: person to whom taxed. Before a deed can be lawfully executed by acounty treasurer for lands sold by him for delinquent taxes, a notice that a deed will be applied for must be rr servec*- by the party entitled thereto “upon the Person possession of the land or town lot, and also upon the person in whose name the same is taxed, if such person resides in the county where the land is situated.!’ Code, § 894,
John C. .Harvey was in possession of the land in controversy at the time the notice was served on him, on the 7th day of July,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McNewis Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
- Binford v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Hall v. GuthridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gates v. WirthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Young v. CharnquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. PughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Adams v. SnowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Smith v. CallananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.