Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Swartsweller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On exceptions to master’s report, filed by Leab Snyder, one of the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancelloe.

The defendant, who excepts to the master’s report, ho&th. two mortgages, prior in date and registry to that of the complainant. They were given to secure the annual payment of the interest of certain sums during the defendant’s life. Receipts .for all interest accrued up to March 31st, 1877, are endorsed on the bonds given with the mortgages, but it is admitted they mainly represent the mortgagor’s notes, which have never been paid. On February 18th, 1878, the defendant was induced to accept a mortgage, embracing the same premises covered by her two prior mortgages, for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gregory v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. In re MerrillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917
  3. Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Rogers v. Trader's InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  5. Dunham v. DeyNew York Supreme Court · 1816

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sixteenth Ward v. Reliable LoanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Cliffside Park v. ProgressiveNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. Hinners v. BirkevaagNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API