Legal Opinion

Parfitt v. Columbus Correctional Facility

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1980No. 79-1531PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.

The sole question before this court is whether the procedure delineated for removals of corrections officers in Ohio Adm. Code 5120-7-05 is a mandatory prerequisite for such removals.

Rules issued by administrative agencies pursuant to statutory authority have the force and effect of law. See Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Glander (1948), 149 Ohio St. 120, 125; State, ex rel. Kildow, v. Indus. Comm. (1934), 128 Ohio St. 573, 580.

In cases such as the one at bar, however, an employee is challenging the actions of an agency by asserting the failure of the agency to follow procedures it has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. James Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Hospital v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Daniel Gurish v. Gerald T. McFaul Sheriff the County Commissioners for Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API