Legal Opinion

Gauger v. Mueller

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 28, 1989No. 88-0939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Eileen and William Gauger appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims against Drs. C.E. Mueller and J.H. Kelertas, Boscobel Clinic, Memorial Hospital of Boscobel, and their respective insurers. The Gaugers had moved the court for an order extending the sec. 655.465(7), Stats., ninety-day time period to allow them to participate in ch. 655 mediation. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that the Gaugers’ failure to participate in a mediation session within the statutory time period deprived the court of competency to exercise its jurisdiction, requiring dismissal of their claims.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Dieckhoff v. SeversonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schulz v. NienhuisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ocasio v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Seaquist v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Dippel v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Ocasio v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API