Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Raneda
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. On November 28, 2011, Referee Hannah C. Dugan issued a report recommending that Attorney J. Manuel Raneda be declared in default, concluding that Attorney Raneda engaged in numerous counts of professional misconduct, and recommending that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for one year and that he pay the full costs of this proceeding.
¶ 2. We conclude that the referee's findings of fact are supported by satisfactory and convincing evidence. Since Attorney Raneda failed to present a defense despite being given multiple opportunities to do so, we declare him to be in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ruppelt v. RuppeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary K. BiesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard W. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ruppelt v. RuppeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark Alan RuppeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.