Legal Opinion

Osborne v. C., D. & M. Railway Co.

Marion County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 15, 1910Published

1Opinion of the CourtBabst, J.

The petition is one for the recovery of damages for an alleged injury suffered by plaintiff, by reason of the negligence of the defendant, the C., D. & M. Ry. Co. The defendants, Eli West and George Whysall, are made parties defendant as receivers of the C., D. & M. Ry. Co. The allegation of the petition out of which the question arises is as follows:

“That Eli West and George Whysall were, by the consideration of the Court of Common Pleas of Marion County, and Franklin county, on the-day of July, A. D. 1909, appointed and qualified as receivers of the defendant company, the Columbus, Delaware…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Kinney v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Blumenthal v. BrainerdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  4. Paige v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Turner v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API