Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orenshaw v. Springfield Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1999Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision dismissing Robert Crenshaw’s (Orenshaw) notice of appeal and subsequent petition for review as untimely filed because the notice of appeal was an improper pleading under the First Class Township Code. Just because the pleading was improperly titled was not cause for its dismissal.

After Orenshaw was terminated from his employment by the Springfield Township Police Department, he filed an appeal with the Springfield Township Civil Service Commission (Commission). The Commission affirmed the Police Department’s action by order dated August 18,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rocco v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Gierschick v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Scott v. Bristol Township Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Gierschick v. State Employes' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Gierschick v. State Employes' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API