Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1978No. 76-188, 76-652 consPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JOHNSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, James Haynes, instituted a negligence action against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (C.T.A.), for injuries allegedly sustained from an assault and battery occurring on a C.T.A. “L” platform. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for directed verdict. Thereafter, the cause was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of *5000. Defendant appeals.

We affirm.

The issues presented for review are (1) regarding foreseeability of the assault and failure to prevent the injury, whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Guthrie v. Van HyfteIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Oldham v. KubinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Miller v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Comastro v. Village of RosemontAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Badillo v. DeVivoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Gordon v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Hopkinson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Mealey v. PittmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API