Haynes v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JOHNSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, James Haynes, instituted a negligence action against defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (C.T.A.), for injuries allegedly sustained from an assault and battery occurring on a C.T.A. “L” platform. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for directed verdict. Thereafter, the cause was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of *5000. Defendant appeals.
We affirm.
The issues presented for review are (1) regarding foreseeability of the assault and failure to prevent the injury, whether…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Guthrie v. Van HyfteIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Oldham v. KubinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Miller v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Comastro v. Village of RosemontAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Badillo v. DeVivoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Gordon v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Hopkinson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Mealey v. PittmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.