Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arthur Fulmer St. Louis, Inc. v. Auto-Re-Nu-Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1964No. 35795Published

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an action at law to recover amounts due the plaintiff, Arthur Fulmer St. Louis, Inc., for merchandise sold to the defendant, Auto-Re-Nu-Inc. The defendant, James D. Borland, Jr., is the president of Auto-Re-Nu-Inc. The defendant, M. J. Flannigan, is a stockholder of Auto-Re-Nu-Inc.

The first cause of action arose out of a $12,000 order sold to- Auto-Re-Nu-Inc., on or about April 1, 1961. As a part of this transaction Auto-Re-Nu-Inc., and Borland and Flannigan executed separate promissory notes payable in installments. There was a balance due on these notes of $8,000 with interest.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas Water Supply Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. First National Bank v. . StoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Flentham v. StewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Huff v. SlifeNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Company v. . BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API