Legal Opinion

Kays v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 8, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

Appellants instituted this action seeking to recover damages resulting from alleged lack of merchantable quality and fitness of a furnace purchased from appellees. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for defendant.

The allegations of the petition clearly bring to issue the question of implied warranty, the alleged breach of which is solely relied upon for the claim of damages. No controversy exists as to the sale and installation of the furnace. The furnace was installed and placed in operation by appel-lee with instructions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Ludlow v. AlbersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAtee v. Holland Furnace Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  2. Kentucky Power Co. v. HoggCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  3. Hatcher v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  4. Fisher v. Florence Stove Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API